SC22 N1236 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to set forth the procedures by which Defect Reports, including requests for interpretations, are handled by ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22 (SC22). 1.2 Scope These procedures conform to and amplify the requirements and definitions specified in the ISO/IEC JTC1 Directives (6.13). They span the full range of documents originated by SC22, including standards and technical reports, The procedures cover all aspects of SC22 processing including: a) flow of documents b) development and approval c) publication d) synchronization with member body activity 1.3 Guiding Principles Several principles have given rise to these procedures. They have been derived from comments made to documents distributed within SC22 and from the JTC1 Directives. These principles are: a) Identification - All requests for interpretation identify some lack of clarity in the document, and as such these can be viewed as one form of Defect Report, and can be addressed under the defect resolution procedures in accordance with the JTC1 Directives and this document. b) Technical Content - The SC22 working group (SC22/WG) that is responsible for the document for which a Defect Report has been received is responsible for the development of the response. c) Responsiveness - The process should be sufficiently rapid as to allow as little time as possible to pass between the time of receipt of a Defect Report and the time the requestor receives an interim response. d) Visibility - The procedures should provide for appropriate visibility of the response to the reported defect among all users of the document. e) Stability - Substantive changes should be made to a document only when demonstrably necessary to correct a significant defect. Frequent or gratuitous changes may complicate compliance and synchronization with other documents. f) Limitation of Scope - These procedures do not grant SC22/WGs license to make substantial alterations to the functionality described by a document. 2 Submitter Procedures This section identifies sources for Defect Requests, and the actions to be taken by the submitter. 2.1 Sources of Requests Defect Reports may be submitted only by: a) a National Body of ISO or IEC b) an SC22/WG c) the project editor for the document d) an organization in liaison with ISO/IEC 2.2 Submission Procedures The submitter of a Defect Report shall prepare and submit ISO/IEC Form 14 (see attachment 1) in accordance with the instructions on the form. 3 Processing This section details the processing of a Defect Report, and assigns specific responsibilities to SC22/WGs and to SC22. The SC22 working group (SC22/WG) that is responsible for the document for which a Defect Report has been received is responsible for the development of the response. 3.1 Overview The responsible SC22/WG shall develop the response to a Defect Report. It shall maintain a log of all Defect Reports and their responses. The response to the Defect Report shall result in a contribution either to a Technical Corrigendum (TC) or to a Record of Response. a) Handling Requests Without a Responsible WG Where no SC22/WG exists with responsibility for a document that is the subject of a Defect Report, SC22 shall establish an ad hoc group to act as a WG for the purpose of developing a response. This group shall perform all of the actions required by a SC22/WG according to these procedures. Results shall be recorded by the SC22 Secretariat which shall maintain a Defect Report Log for each document for that purpose. 3.2 SC22/WG Actions The SC22/WG Convener is responsible for ensuring that all SC22/WG actions specified by these procedures are performed by the SC22/WG. a) Tracking Each SC22/WG shall maintain a log of Defect Reports for each of its documents as required by the JTC1 Directives (6.13.3.7). Each entry in this log shall include: i) the unique Defect Report number assigned by the SC22/WG, ii) full identification of document numbers (including CCITT referencs in joint projects) iii) status of the Defect Report, iv) date when submittal occured, v) date when response is required, vi) date when ballot terminates, vii) date of publication of response to the Defect Report. The interim response to the submitter, and all other correspondence on this Defect Report, shall include the unique Defect Report number. Maintaining the following additional information may prove useful to the SC22/WGs: i) description of reported defect ii) response iii) references within the document, and references to other relevant documents iv) classification (per internal SC22/WG classification scheme) The Convener shall submit the up-to-date Defect Report index to the SC22 Secretariat immediately before each SC22 meeting. b) Developing The responsible SC22/WG shall develop a response to the Defect Report, in accordance with these procedures. Once the SC22/WG has approved the response to the Defect Report, the SC22/WG shall forward an interim response to the submitter. This response should refer to the original submitter's correspondence, include the SC22/WG identification number, and the response to the Defect Report. This response should also make clear that this is an interim response, and a final response must be approved by SC22. c) Publishing For each document, the responsible SC22/WG shall construct responses to Defect Reports as follows: i) Responses requiring normative changes to a document shall specify the textual amendments to be applied. ii) Responses not requiring normative changes may specify textual amendments to an informative annex. Responses requiring textual amendments, as deemed necessary by the responsible SC22/WG, shall be incorporated into a Technical Corri- gendum, for publication by SC22. Where the response to a Defect Report is not incorporated into a TC, it shall be incorporated into a Record of Response, for publication by SC22. d) Batching A Technical Corrigendum or a Record of Reponse may include responses to several Defect Reports. The content and timing of publication is the responsibility of the SC22/WG. Any batching shall take into account the number and significance of the responses and the SC22/WG's plans for revision of the document. e) Distribution Once the resolution has been approved by SC22, the SC22/WG shall send to the submitter of each Defect Report, under cover of a final re- ply letter, a copy of the approved response to that Defect Report. 3.3 SC22 Actions The SC22/WG shall forward draft Technical Corrigenda to the SC22 Secre- tariat, requesting a letter ballot by SC22 and simultaneous distribution to JTC1 for review and comment on the draft Technical Corrigenda by those P- Members of JTC1 that are not P-members of SC22. The SC22/WG shall forward draft Records of Response to the SC22 secretariat, requesting a default letter ballot with a seventy-five day response time. Distribution of the TC or Records of Response shall be accomplished by the SC22 Secretariat consistent with ISO/IEC JTC1 Directives and SC22 procedures. 4 Synchronization This section ensures that Defect Report resolutions to SC22 Standards and Technical Reports are handled the same in the national bodies. This is of particular importance for those SC22 documents that were developed by SC22 member bodies. 4.1 Member Body Development For those SC22/WGs that use national body development, the SC22/WG shall recommend to SC22 those changes to its synchronization plan which accommodate the handling of Defect Reports. SC22 shall review and approve those changes. The same changes are required to be approved by the appropri- ate National Body organization. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------