1. Executive summary
- 
     
Finalize ballot resolution for C++20, to address National Body comments in [N4844].
 - 
     
Start work on features for C++23 and later.
 - 
     
Joins session with LEWG on ABI, based on P1863R1.
 
2. Paper of note
- 
     
P1000R4 C++ IS schedule
 - 
     
P0592R4 To boldly suggest an overall plan for C++23
 - 
     
P1999R0 Process: 2×-🇨🇿 evolutionary material via a Tentatively Ready status
 - 
     
P2118R0 Documenting Core Undefined or Unspecified Behavior
 
3. Tentatively ready papers
Following our process in P1999, here are the papers that EWG considers tentatively ready for CWG. We’ll take a brief look at the next meeting, and if nothing particular concerns anyone, send them to CWG.
- 
     
P1847R2 Make declaration order layout mandated
 - 
     
P2025R0 Guaranteed copy elision for named return objects
 - 
     
P1949R2 C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
 
You can follow this list on GitHub.
4. ABI discussion
We held a joint sessions with LEWG to discuss ABI, based on P1863R1, The outcome of the discussion was as follows:
- 
     
To the best of our ability, we should promise users that we won’t break ABI, ever
Wasn’t contended: we disagree with this statement and might break ABI in the future. - 
     
From now on, we should consider incremental ABI for every C++ release
Received extremely positive support, with a small minority disagreeing strongly. - 
     
We should consider a big ABI break for C++23
Was extremely contended, with a few more people in favor than against. This was insufficient to call consensus. - 
     
We should consider a big ABI break for C++SOMETHING
Was positive enough to call consensus, but still had a quite substantial opposition including many disagreeing strongly. Were we to do a big ABI break we would need to work very hard on consensus building. Indeed, the number of people disagreeing strongly on a poll for a concrete change would block consensus. - 
     
When we are unable to resolve a conflict between performance and ABI compatibility, we should prioritize performance
Was still more positive, but also had a quite substantial opposition including many disagreeing strongly. Again, we should consider performance over ABI but work extremely hard towards consensus building when doing so. 
5. National body comments
- 
     
P2003R0 Fixing Internal and External Linkage Entities in Header Units #740
 - 
     
P2014R0 Proposed resolution for US061/US062 - aligned allocation of coroutine frames #750
 - 
     
P1884R0 Private Module Partition: An Inconsistent Boundary #729
 - 
     
P2100R0 Keep unhandled_exception of a promise type mandatory - a response to US062 and FR066
 - 
     
P2104R0 GB046 Allow caching of evaluations of concept specializations #45
 
6. C++23 discussions
We discussed a few papers which could make it to C++23:
- 
     
P2085R0 Consistent defaulted comparisons
 - 
     
P0592R4 To boldly suggest an overall plan for C++23
 - 
     
P1999R0 Process proposal: double-check evolutionary material via a Tentatively Ready status
 - 
     
P1468R3 Fixed-layout floating-point type aliases
 - 
     
P1467R3 Extended floating-point types
 - 
     
P1371R2 Pattern Matching
 - 
     
P1000R4 C++ IS schedule
 - 
     
P1726R2 Pointer lifetime-end zap
 - 
     
P2092R0 Disambiguating Nested-Requirements
 - 
     
P1040R5 std::embed
 - 
     
P1677R2 Cancellation is not an Error
 - 
     
P1401R2 Narrowing contextual conversions to bool
 - 
     
P0876R10 fiber_context - fibers without scheduler
 - 
     
P0847R4 Deducing this
 - 
     
P2082R1 Fixing CTAD for aggregates
 - 
     
P1774R3 Portable assumptions
 - 
     
P2118R0 Documenting Core Undefined or Unspecified Behavior
 - 
     
P0849R2 auto(x): decay-copy in the language
 - 
     
P2036R0 Changing scope for lambda trailing-return-type
 - 
     
P2071R0 Named universal character escapes
 - 
     
P1900R0 Concepts-Adjacent Problems
 - 
     
P1847R2 Make declaration order layout mandated
 - 
     
P1393R0 A General Property Customization Mechanism
 - 
     
P2026R0 A Constituent Study Group for Safety-Critical Applications
 - 
     
P1938R0 if consteval
 - 
     
P1955R0 Top Level Is Constant Evaluated
 - 
     
P2041R0 Deleting variable templates
 - 
     
P0870R2 A proposal for a type trait to detect narrowing conversions
 - 
     
P2025R0 Guaranteed copy elision for named return objects
 - 
     
P2013R0 Freestanding Language: Optional ::operator new
 - 
     
P1949R2 C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
 
The following papers were scheduled for discussion, but authors requested to delay until the next meeting:
- 
     
P1967R1 #embed - a simple, scannable preprocessor-based resource acquisition method
 - 
     
P1046R2 Automatically Generate More Operators
 - 
     
P2049R0 Constraint refinement for special-cased functions
 
The following papers were scheduled for discussion, but were seen in SG7 Reflection who decided to table them for now:
- 
     
P1733R0 User-friendly and Evolution-friendly Reflection: A Compromise
 - 
     
P2089R0 Function parameter constraints are fragile
 
7. Near-future EWG plans
We will continue to work on C++23, prioritizing according to P0592.